McLaren Says Pit Strategy Errors Cost Norris a Shot at Miami Grand Prix Win
Zero Signal Staff
Published May 5, 2026 at 12:07 AM ET · 15 days ago

Formula1.com
McLaren Team Principal Andrea Stella said Lando Norris could have won the Miami Grand Prix if McLaren had executed and optimized its pit stop strategy better, according to Formula1.com.
McLaren Team Principal Andrea Stella said Lando Norris could have won the Miami Grand Prix if McLaren had executed and optimized its pit stop strategy better, according to Formula1.com. Norris finished second behind Mercedes driver Kimi Antonelli after McLaren pitted him one lap later than Antonelli, a timing call that allowed Mercedes to complete an undercut and keep track position.
The Details
Formula1.com reported that McLaren arrived in Miami with an extensive upgrade package that Stella had previously described as a "completely new car." The weekend began strongly for the team: Norris secured pole for the Sprint and won it for his first victory of the season, while teammate Oscar Piastri finished second to give McLaren a 1-2 result in the Sprint.
The main race unfolded differently. According to Formula1.com, Mercedes driver Kimi Antonelli took pole in qualifying and then won the Miami Grand Prix, with Norris finishing second and Piastri third. That result left McLaren with another strong points return, but Stella said the team had missed a realistic chance to convert Norris's position into a Grand Prix victory.
Stella pointed to two separate problems in McLaren's race execution, according to Formula1.com: the timing of Norris's stop and time lost in pit lane. McLaren pitted Norris one lap after Antonelli, giving Mercedes the opportunity to use the undercut. Once Mercedes had completed that move and maintained position, McLaren's chance to protect Norris's lead was reduced.
"I think today in the race we might have lost the possibility to win it, again for a matter of execution and optimisation of what was available," Stella told Formula1.com after the race. "We were fighting a faster car than us, but perhaps if we had kept Lando in the lead, we could have led it to the finish."
Stella also told Formula1.com that Mercedes remained ahead on outright performance. He said Mercedes still had a "couple of tenths advantage" over the field and that the gap was most visible during the Miami race and the preceding day. That assessment framed McLaren's missed opportunity as both a strategy issue and a pace comparison: Stella said McLaren had to execute cleanly because it was competing against a faster car.
The result still showed a major improvement from McLaren's earlier season form, according to Formula1.com. Stella said the team was "extremely satisfied" with the weekend because McLaren scored more points in Miami than it had in the previous three races combined and because of the performance trend created by the upgrade package.
McLaren's Miami performance also changed how Stella described the competitive order. Formula1.com reported that he said four teams are now in tight competition, with McLaren, Ferrari and Red Bull closing the gap to Mercedes. Stella's view was not that Mercedes had been caught outright; he said Mercedes retained a slight overall advantage even as the group behind it moved closer.
Context
McLaren's upgrade package was central to the Miami weekend, according to Formula1.com. Stella had described the package before the event as a "completely new car," and the results in Miami gave the team evidence that the changes had improved its position after an unsteady start to the 2026 season.
The constructors' championship picture entering Miami showed why McLaren's gains mattered within the sourced record. MotorBiscuit reported that Mercedes came into the round leading the standings with 135 points, 45 ahead of Ferrari and 90 ahead of McLaren. Against that backdrop, McLaren's Sprint 1-2 and double podium in the Grand Prix narrowed the performance conversation even as Mercedes still converted the main race into a win.
Stella's comments also separated tire consistency from outright speed, according to Formula1.com. He said Mercedes held a couple of tenths in pure pace, while McLaren had retained strong tire consistency from the previous season. That combination shaped his explanation of the race: McLaren had enough race strength to pressure Mercedes, but not enough margin to absorb a mistimed stop and pit lane losses.
Formula1.com reported that Stella grouped McLaren, Ferrari and Red Bull as teams closing on Mercedes, while still describing Mercedes as slightly ahead overall. GPblog.com and Total Motorsport also carried reporting on Stella's view of the tighter title picture after Miami, corroborating that McLaren's weekend was seen inside the team as a sign of progress rather than only a missed win.
What's Next
Formula1.com reported that McLaren has additional upgrades planned, and Stella said those updates come from the "same group" as the Miami package and should bring further improvement. That is the clearest sourced next step for McLaren after a weekend in which the team converted its upgrade into Sprint success and a Grand Prix podium but not the race win.
Stella's own post-race assessment sets the immediate focus for McLaren: improve execution and optimization while continuing to develop the car. Formula1.com reported that he identified pit lane time loss as an execution issue separate from the strategic timing decision, giving the team two concrete areas to review from Miami.
The competitive order will also remain tied to Mercedes' measured advantage. Stella told Formula1.com that Mercedes still had a couple of tenths over the field, while McLaren, Ferrari and Red Bull were closing. McLaren's next test, based on the facts in the brief, is whether future upgrades can add performance without leaving race execution as the limiting factor.
Never Miss a Signal
Get the latest breaking news and daily briefings from Zero Signal News directly to your inbox.
